Who doesn’t fund the Federalist?

NBC claims Google banned the Federalist from its ad platform…wrongly

Google logo
Google logo
Share
Text
Text Size
Small
Medium
Large
Line Spacing
Small
Normal
Large

One of the internet’s most elusive questions — who funds the Federalist? — has finally been answered. Well, sort of. NBC announced Tuesday that Google would be banning the Federalist from its ad platform, meaning the conservative website will no longer be able to earn money from running Google ads.

The Federalist was targeted alongside ZeroHedge, a right-wing financial blog. Or so NBC claimed.

‘We have strict publisher policies that govern the content ads can run on and explicitly prohibit derogatory content that promotes hatred, intolerance, violence or discrimination based on race from monetizing,’ a Google spokesperson…

One of the internet’s most elusive questions — who funds the Federalist? — has finally been answered. Well, sort of. NBC announced Tuesday that Google would be banning the Federalist from its ad platform, meaning the conservative website will no longer be able to earn money from running Google ads.

The Federalist was targeted alongside ZeroHedge, a right-wing financial blog. Or so NBC claimed.

‘We have strict publisher policies that govern the content ads can run on and explicitly prohibit derogatory content that promotes hatred, intolerance, violence or discrimination based on race from monetizing,’ a Google spokesperson said of the decision. ‘When a page or site violates our policies, we take action. In this case, we’ve removed both sites’ ability to monetize with Google.’

The ‘derogatory’ content in question included an article published by the Federalist in which they accuse the larger media of lying about the presence of rioting and looting during the George Floyd protests. It’s unclear why exactly that claim would be considered problematic considering CNN’s Brian Stelter tried to gaslight his followers just last week by suggesting there hadn’t been any new riots. That was around the same time that activists in Seattle ran police out of a local precinct and created an ‘autonomous zone’ manned by armed ‘warlords’. If criticizing the mainstream media is grounds for being banned from Google’s ad platform, Cockburn surmises that every conservative outlet is at risk. Thank goodness The Spectator is more cocktail party than political party, eh?

NBC News revealed in an article that they were the ones who ‘brought’ the article to Google’s ‘attention’. But NBC News conveniently skated around the fact that they did activism rather than journalism to get the Federalist banned. Adele-Momoko Fraser, the author of the NBC News piece, revealed on Twitter that she had done a ‘collaboration’ with an advocacy group, the Center for Countering Digital Hate. Much like Media Matters posts out-of-context Tucker Carlson clips to drum up outrage against his advertisers, the CCDH flags articles it deems racist or bigoted and then advocates for their censorship by big tech companies. CCDH announced that getting the Federalist banned from Google’s ad platform was its ‘biggest ever win’.

Fraser similarly celebrated her victory over the ‘far-right’ Federalist, pinning her tweet about her collaborating with the CCDH to the top of her Twitter timeline. Cockburn, who has an eye for anglicisms, noticed she used the British spelling of ‘enquiry’ in her article. Perhaps Fraser’s London background, if not her activism on behalf of the Labour party, can partially explain her distaste for the concept of freedom of speech.

[special_offer]

Update 6/16 5:50pm: